HFIM analyzes the quality of lubricants

Optimizer4D can automatically rate lubricants in terms of their mechanical and dynamic properties. The images show the difference in structure-borne sounds between two different lubricants during an abrasion test of axial cylinder roller bearings, according to DIN51819.

During the testing at a FE-8 test bench an axial load has been raised upon a disc spring pack.

Composition of lubricant A: base oil SAE 75W-80 with wear protective additives

Composition of lubricant B: like lubricant A, but also with anti-corrosion additives

Starting point for this testing with Schaeffler was the search for the cause of sudden machine failures (machine failure with consequential damage). Among the results of the testing in May 2014 is the realisation that the Optimizer4D can detect the impact of different lubricants on the bearing, as the HFIM images show.

Detection of wear of bearings

HFIM signals of lubricant A with anti-corrosive additives, without protective additives: Initially, strong HFIM-signals are detected during which lubricant A shows noticeable HFIM-signals and thus a heavy strain on the bearing. But this is only the turbulent beginning phase which can be minimized with the help of the machines controls. The long-term strain is crucial here, which speaks for the quality of lubricant A – it does not do any damage to the bearings in the long-term view.

HFIM-signals of lubricant B with wear protective additives as well as anti-corrosive additives: This lubricant may show a rather smooth start, but after about 1800 minutes, strong acoustic emissions can be detected, which are caused by pittings forming in the bearing.

Although lubricant A starts with some rough signals, it shows good long-term characeristics.

Although lubricant A starts with some rough signals, it shows good long-term characeristics.

Lubricant B starts smooth - but in the end, it causes pitting in the bearing.

Lubricant B starts smooth – but in the end, it causes pitting in the bearing.